Go, Igo, Baduk, Weiqi (囲碁)
≡ Menu

The Guardian über Lukrez

Lucretius (full name Titus Lucretius Carus) lived in the first half of the century BC, probably from 99 to 55 BC. He overlapped chronologically with the political titan Cicero (who had read and admired Lucretius’s work), and wrote during the tumultuous times that led, in the period after his death, to the collapse of the Roman republic and the establishment of the Roman emperors. His only work is De Rerum Natura, a six-book poem of roughly 7,500 lines, the beauty and power of which inspired allusion (the most literary form of flattery) and outright tribute in his more famous Roman poetic successors, including Virgil and Ovid. He wrote in a register of Latin that was self-consciously poetic, with occasional use of archaic vocabulary, and in the metre that since Homer had been the rhythm of epic heroes. But his subject was not, as we might expect, war, love, myth or history; it was atomic physics.

The title of his work reveals the ambition: De Rerum Natura is variously translated as “The nature of things”, “On the nature of things” and “On the nature of the universe”, a poem to explain the entire world around us. The choice of poetry as a medium for discussing and (as is Lucretius’s stated aim) teaching physics might seem bizarre to us, but Lucretius did have some precedent in the pre-Socratic philosophers, who tried to explain the physics of the world, as several wrote in verse; most notably (for Lucretius), Empedocles had written a work, On Nature, setting out his physical theory (he believed everything was made from the four elements). The idea of a Latin poem about atomic physics jars us, however, not just because we don’t naturally associate physics with verse, but because when someone mentions atoms, we tend to think of large hadron colliders rather than togas.

Several centuries before Lucretius was writing, however, some Greek thinkers had come to the conclusion that, if the world were actually to be able to exist as we perceive it, it would need to be made of some form of microscopic stuff that was in some way permanent. Atom literally means “indivisible”; Democritus and Leucippus first set out the idea of indivisible things (in response to ideas about the seeming paradoxes of divisibility most famously proposed by Zeno) in the 5th century BC. During the period that saw Alexander the Great rise to power, a Greek called Epicurus adopted and adapted that atomic theory for a very specific purpose: the promotion of human happiness.

“Epicurean” is a word that to modern ears implies (if anything) behaviour we don’t tend to connect with modern physics: epicurean.com, for example, is “For food and wine lovers”, and calling someone an Epicurean has, since at least the time of Milton, meant calling them an indulgent pleasure seeker to some degree. That meaning comes from the fact that Epicurus’s philosophy is, at its heart, a hedonistic, or pleasure-seeking, creed; however, Epicurus believed that the greatest pleasure was simply to be free from mental distress, and that the surefire route to such a de-stressed soul was understanding atomic physics.

Lucretius tells us that Epicurus’s belief in the human need for science was rooted in compassion: he looked around and saw a world full of people cringing in fear and dread of the wrath of the gods, as expressed via random phenomena such as lightning and earthquakes, which he aimed to teach them were in fact purely natural disasters (the legal shorthand “act of god” would have had his hackles rising). It was to appease that soul-crushing fear that Epicurus turned the atomic theory of Democritus and Leucippus into a means to provide a physics-based rationale of the world around us: if we understand the physics, we will see that we have nothing to fear from the gods. Epicureans were not atheists, but believed that the gods had no interest in humanity or our world. Lucretius’ mission is to explain that physics in beautiful poetry, to make it more understandable and more palatable to his readership than its occasional philosophical obscurity might otherwise be.

Richard Feynman said that the sentence that contained the most scientific information in the fewest words was “all things are made of atoms”. De Rerum Natura gives us that basic of physics, and a lot more besides: refutations of rival theories, explanations of mirrors and magnets, reasons not to fear death, some strong words about the folly of love, a mini-survey of human history and a range of causes for celestial and meteorological phenomena. Lucretius shows us the existence of invisible particles via the visible reality of the world around us, bombarding his reader with arguments and examples, to bring us what he believes is the truth of the universe and the key to contentment.

Artikel auf guardian.co.uk

Auf 3Sat lief vor drei Jahren der Thementag Latein. Daraus die Sendung Kulturzeit, vollständig in Latein, aber deutsch untertitelt:

Bayern 2, Das Kalenderblatt — Podcast

Petrus von Ravenna veröffentlichte am 10. Januar 1491 Phoenix – die Kunst des Gedächtnisses, einer der ersten Bestseller auf dem Buchmarkt, wenn auch nicht die erste Methode, das träge Gedächtnis zu trainieren. Autorin: Christiane Neukirch

[audio:https://www.latinisator.ch/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Petrus-von-Ravenna-trainiert-das-Gedächtnis-10.01.1491-10.01.2013.mp3|titles=Das Kalenderblatt – Podcast Bayern 2 – Petrus von Ravenna trainiert das Gedächtnis]

Phoenix seu artificiosa memoria

Hier das oben erwähnte Werk in der Ausgabe von 1600 aus Vicenza (Quelle: Google Books):

Antikes Rechenrätsel

Anthologia Palatina 14,1

Πολυκράτης
ὄλβιε Πυθαγόρη, Μουσέων Ἑλικώνιον ἔρνος,
εἰπέ μοι εἰρομένῳ, ὁπόσοι σοφίης κατ᾽ ἀγῶνα
σοῖσι δόμοισιν ἔασιν, ἀεθλεύοντες ἄριστα.

Πυθαγόρας
τοιγὰρ ἐγὼν εἴποιμι, Πολύκρατες: ἡμίσεες μὲν
ἀμφὶ καλὰ σπεύδουσι μαθήματα: τέτρατοι αὖτε
ἀθανάτου φύσεως πεπονήαται: ἑβδομάτοις δὲ
σιγὴ πᾶσα μέμηλε, καὶ ἄφθιτοι ἔνδοθι μῦθοι:
τρεῖς δὲ γυναῖκες ἔασι, Θεανὼ δ᾽ ἔξοχος ἄλλων.
τόσσους Πιερίδων ὑποφήτορας αὐτὸς ἀγινῶ.

Polykrates
Edler Pythagoras, Spross helikonischer göttlicher Musen,
sage mir an, wie viele es sind in deiner Behausung,
welche am besten bestehen als Jünger im Kampfe der Weisheit?

Pythagoras
Sagen will ich es dir, Polykrates: Siehe die Hälfte
lernt die herrliche Mathematik, hingegen ein Viertel
ringt, die Natur zu erforschen, die ewige; völliges Schweigen
übt der siebente Teil und hört unsterbliche Reden.
Drei sind Frauen dabei, doch herrlich vor allen Theano.
Soviel leite als Jünger ich an im Dienste der Musen.

Phaedrus, Fabulae 1, 8
Lupus et gruis — Der Wolf und der Kranich
erklärt von Rolf Illig